QUOTE(victory_fils @ Apr 22 2005, 06:17 AM)
Good points by rabbaddal.
I am always amazed, however, by the apparent dichotomy between standards for religious leadership and leadership for other organizations. "Selected with the guidance of the Holy Spirit..." "Sense of optimism that all shall be well..."
I do not think these points will hold any kind of water if we were talking about the appointment of a new CEO to govern a business in which we own stocks, or a new President to govern our country.
Can we afford to be extra skeptical and vocal about leaders in charge of our money and public services, but keep mum about leaders supposedly in charge of our souls and that of our children's?
Sir, I guess that would what rabbaddal called the "mystery".
QUOTE(rabbaddal @ Apr 21 2005, 03:39 PM)
That is part of the mystery of being Catholic - it is the sense of optimism that all shall be well no matter how much otherwise reality may suggest.
Rabbaddal's point encapsulizes the Catholic Dogma regarding Papal authority. The Pope by virtue of having the "Divine assistance" first promised to Peter by Jesus would be infalliable. But it must be clarified that he only is when he speaks
ex cathedra. Ex Cathedra teaching should be:
QUOTE
The pontiff must teach in his public and official capacity as pastor and doctor of all Christians, not merely in his private capacity as a theologian, preacher ar allocutionist, nor in his capacity as a temporal prince or as a mere ordinary of the Diocese of Rome. It must be clear that he speaks as spiritual head of the Church universal.
Then it is only when, in this capacity, he teaches some doctrine of faith or morals that he is infallible (see below, IV).
Further it must be sufficiently evident that he intends to teach with all the fullness and finality of his supreme Apostolic authority, in other words that he wishes to determine some point of doctrine in an absolutely final and irrevocable way, or to define it in the technical sense (see DEFINITION). These are well-recognized formulas by means of which the defining intention may be manifested.
Finally for an ex cathedra decision it must be clear that the pope intends to bind the whole Church. To demand internal assent from all the faithful to his teaching under pain of incurring spiritual shipwreck (naufragium fidei) according to the expression used by Pius IX in defining the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin.
I'm not sure but it is said that infalliability does not require holiness of life. Which might absolve some of the scandalous Popes the Church had in her history.
But I think what tempers the enduring conservative nature of the Catholic Church is its absolute truths. In saying no to "relativism" and to other current thoughts, the Church might as well be locked in the past. There is just the problem of making these "truths" seep through in modern times. Clearly there is a need for the teachings and doctrines of Faith to be connected to our daily lives today, to revitalize Christians. Having said that, the Church leadership should recognize if any current practice or preaching deviates from her "truths". So that we could prevent recurrences of misinformation prevalent in the times of Rizal.